Moderation Systems

Our moderation pipeline combines automated detection, human review, and creator accountability to enforce policies at scale while minimizing errors.

Last updated: February 2026

Three-Layer Architecture

Layer 1: Automated Detection

Machine learning models scan uploads for policy violations before content is published. Catches CSAM, spam, known harmful media, and dangerous content in real time.

Layer 2: Community Reporting

Users can report content, comments, messages, and accounts. Reports are prioritized by severity and volume. Repeated valid reporters receive higher trust scores.

Layer 3: Human Review

Every enforcement action is reviewed by a trained human moderator. Complex and borderline cases are escalated to senior Trust & Safety staff.

Moderation Queue

Reports and automated flags enter a structured queue:

1 Content is flagged (automated or user report)
→
2 Priority score is assigned (severity × volume × user trust)
→
3 Case is created and assigned to a moderator
→
4 Moderator reviews with full context (content, history, reports)
→
5 Decision is made, logged, and the creator is notified

Service Level Agreements

Priority LevelDescriptionResponse Target
CriticalCSAM, terrorism, imminent violence threats< 1 hour
HighHarassment, hate speech, dangerous misinformation< 4 hours
MediumSpam, impersonation, misleading content< 24 hours
LowMinor policy violations, quality disputes< 72 hours

Automated Systems

  • Image/video scanning: Hashing and ML classification for known harmful content (PhotoDNA integration for CSAM).
  • Audio analysis: Copyright fingerprinting and harmful speech detection.
  • Text classification: Real-time comment and message scanning for spam, hate speech, and threats.
  • Behavioral analysis: Detection of coordinated inauthentic behavior, spam rings, and bot networks.
  • Metadata analysis: Identifying suspicious upload patterns, account creation anomalies, and evasion tactics.

Human Moderator Standards

  • All moderators complete 40+ hours of training before reviewing live cases.
  • Regular calibration sessions ensure consistency across the team.
  • Quality audits review a random sample of decisions weekly.
  • Moderators have access to wellness support and mandatory break schedules.
  • Complex or borderline cases require senior reviewer sign-off.

False Positive Handling

We recognize that automated systems and human reviewers can make mistakes. Our approach to minimizing harm from false positives:

  • Automated removals for non-critical violations are held in a review queue before enforcement.
  • Creators are notified immediately and can appeal with one click.
  • False positive appeals receive expedited review (target: 24 hours).
  • Repeated false positives on the same creator trigger a system recalibration review.
Report content: Use the report button on any content, comment, or profile. For urgent safety concerns, email safety@vynzoa.com.